Skip to content

15.6 — Journalling That Works, and the Self-Counselling Session

Journalling: the version with evidence

Most journalling does nothing, and some makes things worse.

What makes things worse: writing the same grievance repeatedly. That is rumination with a pen (5.5), and there is evidence that this kind of journalling is associated with worse outcomes.

What has evidence: expressive writing. James Pennebaker's paradigm — fifteen to twenty minutes a day, on three or four consecutive days, about a difficult experience: what happened, how you felt about it, and what it means.

Effects are real and modest. Improvements in wellbeing, and in some studies in physical health measures.

Why it works, as far as anybody can tell: constructing a coherent narrative. Analyses of the writing find that people who improved were the ones whose accounts became more organised and more causally connected across the days, and who increased their use of insight words. The benefit is in the construction, not in the venting.

Which gives four rules.

Time-limited and finite. Three or four sessions on one topic, then done.

Write towards meaning, not only feeling. What happened, how it felt, and what it means and what it has changed.

Do not write the same thing every day for a month about the same grievance.

And it is not for everybody. Some people find it distressing and there is no obligation.

Other formats that work: the three-line daily log (4.5), the thought record (15.3), a decision journal (1.4), and a gratitude entry a few times a week (16.4) — not daily, which produces habituation.

The self-counselling session

A structured hour, run on yourself, weekly or when something is stuck. Written, because held in your head it becomes rumination.

Before

Same time, same place, weekly. The frame is part of the treatment (15.1).

Forty-five minutes to an hour. Phone away.

And one notebook kept for this, so you can read back across weeks — which is the substitute for the therapist noticing patterns.

The seven steps

1. Check in. Five minutes.

How has the week been, out of ten? What has the dominant feeling been? What is different from last week?

Physical first (6.8): sleep, food, movement, alcohol. Note it, because the pattern across weeks is informative.

2. Pick one thing. Five minutes.

One. The thing you keep returning to, or the strongest feeling of the week.

Write it as a single sentence. "I keep feeling dismissed at work."

3. Get the facts. Ten minutes.

What actually happened, in camera language (10.9). Specific incidents, dates, exact words.

Separate fact from interpretation ruthlessly (4.1). Two columns.

This step alone frequently resolves it, because the interpretation was doing all the work and there are two incidents rather than the fifteen it felt like.

4. Examine it. Fifteen minutes.

Choose the tool that fits.

If the thought may be distorted: thought record (15.3). Evidence for, evidence against, balanced alternative.

If the thought is accurate and the situation cannot change: ACT (15.4). What am I fighting, what would willingness look like, what direction do I want to move in anyway.

If the emotion is the problem: what is it, what is it for, is the size right, is the target right (4.2).

If it is a person: what pattern, what have I tried, what is actually available (13.2).

If it is a decision: the four questions (1.4), the outside view (1.8), and what I would tell a friend.

5. Ask the question you are avoiding. Five minutes.

The hardest step and the one that makes this worth doing.

What am I not letting myself say about this?What would somebody who loves me and is honest say?What is my part in it?What am I getting out of keeping it this way?

Write the answer even if you dislike it. This is the step a friend will not do and a therapist will, and doing it for yourself requires deliberately going towards the discomfort.

6. Decide one action. Five minutes.

One. Specific. This week. With a day attached.

Not "be more assertive". "On Tuesday I will tell Ravi that I need forty-eight hours' notice."

A session with no action is a session of rumination with better formatting.

7. Close. Five minutes.

Write one sentence on what you understood. One sentence on what you will do. Then close the book and stop thinking about it — the frame includes an ending.

Monthly

Read back four sessions. This is where the pattern work happens.

What has come up more than once? What have I decided and not done? What has changed?

Recurring themes across unrelated topics are the real material, and they are only visible in the record.

What this cannot do

Restated from 15.1, because it matters most here.

You will not see your blind spots. The record helps; it is not the same.

You will not ask the hardest question as hard as somebody else would.

And there is no relationship, which is a large share of what makes therapy work.

So: use it as the main thing for ordinary difficulty, and as the supplement for anything more. And if the same theme is still there after three months of sessions, that is your answer about whether to get a person.

What to do

Book the first session in your calendar now, with a time and a place.

Buy the notebook. Physical, kept for this.

Run the seven steps once, and expect it to feel awkward.

Do the action.

And read back after four weeks. That reading is where most of the value is, and it is the step people skip.

Next: 15.7 gives the measurement tools and, more importantly, the lines at which self-help stops being the right answer.